Where do I start inside the Reliability & Common Problems hub?
The card groups above are ordered from most-searched to niche — pick the group that matches what you're troubleshooting or shopping for.
The failures owners actually see — sourced and priced against the records on each page.
Reliability at a glance. 'Avoid' = documented high-failure model years; 'buy' = the revision where the fix landed.
| Model | Years to avoid | Years to buy | Biggest risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outback | 1999–2012 (EJ25 SOHC) | 2015–2018 FB25, 2020+ FA24 | External head-gasket / oil use |
| Forester | 2014–2018 (FB25 pre-revision) | 2019+ (revised pistons) | Piston-ring oil consumption |
| WRX / STI | 2008–2014 if tuned aggressively | 2015+ VA on stock tune | Ringland, rod-bearing spin |
| Crosstrek | 2013–2018 (TR580 pre-reflash) | 2019+ (TSB-updated CVT) | CVT torque-converter shudder |
| Legacy | 2005–2009 GT turbo (oil starve) | 2015+ FB25 sedans | Turbo failure / head gasket |
| Ascent | 2019 (pre-refresh) | 2020+ | PCV valve, trans-cooler leak |
| BRZ (Toyobaru) | 2013–2016 (pre-recall) | 2017+; 2022+ 2nd gen | FA20 valve-spring recall |
Subaru's reputation for reliability is complicated. Consumer Reports has ranked the brand top-10 for years, but the same brand has faced three major class-action settlements (oil consumption, CVT durability, Starlink infotainment) in the past decade and carries a longer NHTSA recall history than Honda or Toyota. Both things are true at once, and this hub is where we reconcile them. We track every documented failure in the 81-entry Subaru problems database, cross-reference it to Subaru's own TSBs, and tag each one with severity, affected years, and repair cost.
The pattern that emerges once you look at the data is this: Subaru reliability is highly model- and generation-dependent. The 2015–2019 Outback is a different reliability story from the 2020–2024 Outback, and both are different from the 2013 model that shares the badge. Averages hide this. When you drill into the individual failure modes — head gaskets on the EJ25, oil consumption on the FB25, CVT shudder on the TR580, windshield cracking on the 2019+ Forester — a much clearer picture emerges of which used Subaru is a bargain and which is a warning sign.
The buying-guide advice we give most often is: don't buy a Subaru without pulling the specific failure list for that model-year combination first. A 2011 Outback 2.5i is a head-gasket bet. A 2014 Forester with the FB25 is an oil-consumption bet. A 2018 WRX with the FA20DIT and any tune history is a ringland bet. None of these are dealbreakers if the previous owner did the right preventive work; all of them are dealbreakers if they didn't.
The critical and major failures — the ones that can strand you, damage the engine, or wipe out the drivetrain — are called out at the top of every model hub with the severity rating from our internal classification (critical / major / moderate / minor / advisory). Advisory issues are things worth knowing about but not worth walking away from. Critical issues are the ones where you should either negotiate the repair into the sale price or find another car.
Below you'll find failure lists organized by model, the severity legend we use across the site, and links to the deeper hubs — engine, transmission, WRX-specific — where the technical explanations live. If you're shopping, start with the model that matches your target car. If you're diagnosing, use the search on the main problems database.
The single most useful reliability signal we track — more useful than Consumer Reports rankings or J.D. Power scores — is the ratio of NHTSA complaints per 100,000 units sold. It normalizes for market share, filters out the noise of low-volume enthusiast cars, and lines up cleanly with owner-forum sentiment year over year. On that metric, the FB25 post-2019 Outback and Forester and the current-generation Ascent are the strongest Subarus in the lineup. The 2015–2019 Legacy 2.5i is another quiet reliability standout: never a class leader on paper, consistently near the top on complaint density. Every model hub carries the raw numbers so you can compare directly.
The other pattern worth calling out is the difference between reliability of the car and reliability of the platform. A 2013 Outback 2.5i is a head-gasket bet, but the platform underneath it — the 5MT transaxle, the Active-Torque-Split AWD, the wheel bearings, the suspension — is famously durable. A 2019 Ascent is the opposite: a solid drivetrain wrapped around interior components (power liftgate motors, infotainment head units, moonroof drains) that generate an outsized share of the warranty claims. When we say a Subaru is reliable, we mean the failure modes are known and predictable — not that nothing ever breaks. That distinction is what the severity tags on each problem page are meant to capture.
If you're shopping, use the model-by-model cards below as your starting point, cross-reference the VIN against the recall database, and read the two-to-three failure pages that apply to your specific target year. If you're diagnosing, start from the symptom on your car's problems page and follow the linked repair-cost breakdown to price the fix at each shop tier.
Every documented failure mode for the model you own or are shopping.
14 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
15 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
12 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
11 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
9 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
7 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
8 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
5 documented failures — severity, symptoms, root cause, repair cost, and permanent fix.
The complete map of pages inside this hub — grouped by category so you can jump straight to the technical area you need.
The failures we tell buyers to walk away from — or negotiate the fix into the sale price.
Detonation cracks the second piston ringland, destroying the engine — common in tuned 2008-2014 WRX/STI.
STI rod bearings spin under sustained high RPM — often catastrophic and without warning.
Excess factory RTV sealant breaks loose and clogs the oil pickup screen — engine starvation.
Subaru's most famous defect — external coolant/oil leaks from the head gasket on 1999-2009 2.5L.
Torque-converter shudder at 30-45 mph and chain-belt failures plagued 2010-2018 CVTs.
2011-2015 Foresters burn 1 quart per 1,000 miles — class-action settlement covers ring replacement.
2013-2017 Crosstreks share the Outback's torque-converter shudder issue.
VF40/VF46 turbos on 2005-2009 Legacy GT fail by 100k miles from oil starvation.
Model- and year-dependent. The FB25-powered Outback and Forester built after the 2019 piston-ring update, the pre-2014 non-turbo Impreza, and the 2015+ Legacy 2.5i are all above-average reliability picks. The 2011–2013 Outback (EJ25 head gaskets), the 2015–2018 WRX (ringlands), and any FB25 Forester before the 2019 update are all below-average.
The 2015–2019 Legacy 2.5i and the 2020+ Outback 2.5i with the FB25 (post-piston-ring update) are the two highest-reliability new-Subaru picks in the current owner data. Both avoid the turbocharged FA-series drama and the pre-2019 oil-consumption pattern.
The 2011–2013 Outback and Forester with the EJ25 SOHC (head gaskets), the 2014–2018 Forester with the early FB25 (oil consumption), and any 2015–2018 WRX with an aftermarket tune (ringlands). None are undriveable — but all three need either preventive work already done or a significant price discount.
With scheduled CVT fluid changes and engine oil at proper intervals, most modern Subarus reach 200,000 miles without a major driveline repair. The EJ25 head-gasket generation typically needs the gasket done between 120k–160k, but many go beyond 250k with it done.
The card groups above are ordered from most-searched to niche — pick the group that matches what you're troubleshooting or shopping for.
Start with EJ255/EJ257 Ringland Failure — it's the featured write-up in this cluster, with symptoms, root cause, and a repair-cost estimate.
Reliability & Common Problems cross-references Engine Guides and Transmission & AWD.
Dig into the Problems Database to plan your next maintenance sprint, or browse every model hub for buyer's guides, generation breakdowns, and known-issue lists.